Undertaken in collaboration with the Chief Probation Officers of California. In this program, offenders are sentenced to conditions of community supervision and services based upon their individual needs and risk for recidivism as determined using an offender risk and needs assessment tool.Ĭalifornia Risk Assessment Pilot Project ( CalRAPP see also: CalRAPP final report)īegan in 2009 and completed in 2015 to take a more detailed look at the implementation of EBP, including the use or RNA at sentencing. The report shall also contain the officer’s recommendation for supervision and treatment services based upon the convicted person’s documented criminogenic risk and needs when authorized.Īrkansas Judiciary Administrative Order 14 and the Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial District Administrative Order Implementing the Administrative Plan for Calendar Year 2016Ĭircuit courts in AR's Columbia, Ouachita, and Union counties are piloting the Alternative Sentencing (formerly Smarter Sentencing) program, which is authorized by state and local administrative orders. 2009 – 543 amending Arizona Code of Judicial Administration § 6-201.01: Standard Probation Evidence Based Practiceįor all probation eligible cases, presentence reports shall also contain case information related to criminogenic risk and needs as documented by the standardized risk assessment and other file and collateral information. No defendant, unless the court shall otherwise direct, shall be placed on probation or released under suspension of sentence until the report of such investigation shall have been presented to and considered by the court provided, however, that after conviction the court may continue the case for such time as may be reasonably necessary to enable the probation officer to make his investigation and report.Īrizona Supreme Court Administrative Order No. Code of Alabama Section 15-22-51 Investigation by probation officer(a) When directed by the court, a probation officer shall fully investigate and report to the court in writing the circumstances of the offense, criminal record, social history and present condition of a defendant through use of a validated risk and needs assessment, as defined in Section 12-25-32.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |